When I first got interested in this field, I kept seeing the terms computational linguistics and natural language processing (NLP) used almost interchangeably. At first, I thought they were the same thing. By delving deeper through reading papers, taking courses, and conducting research, I realized that although they overlap significantly, they are not entirely identical.
So in this post, I want to explain the difference (and connection) between computational linguistics and NLP from the perspective of a high school student who’s just getting started, but really interested in understanding both the language and the tech behind today’s AI systems.
So, what is computational linguistics?
Computational linguistics is the science of using computers to understand and model human language. It’s rooted in linguistics, the study of how language works, and applies computational methods to test linguistic theories, analyze language structure, or build tools like parsers and grammar analyzers.
It’s a field that sits at the intersection of computer science and linguistics. Think syntax trees, morphology, phonology, semantics, and using code to work with all of those.
For example, in computational linguistics, you might:
- Use code to analyze sentence structure in different languages
- Create models that explain how children learn grammar rules
- Explore how prosody (intonation and stress) changes meaning in speech
- Study how regional dialects appear in online chat platforms like Twitch
In other words, computational linguistics is often about understanding language (how it’s structured, how it varies, and how we can model it with computers).
Then what is NLP?
Natural language processing (NLP) is a subfield of AI and computer science that focuses on building systems that can process and generate human language. It’s more application-focused. If you’ve used tools like ChatGPT, Google Translate, Siri, or even grammar checkers, you’ve seen NLP in action.
While computational linguistics asks, “How does language work, and how can we model it?”, NLP tends to ask, “How can we build systems that understand or generate language usefully?”
Examples of NLP tasks:
- Sentiment analysis (e.g., labeling text as positive, negative, or neutral)
- Machine translation
- Named entity recognition (e.g., tagging names, places, dates)
- Text summarization or question answering
In many cases, NLP researchers care more about whether a system works than whether it matches a formal linguistic theory. That doesn’t mean theory doesn’t matter, but the focus is more on performance and results.
So, what’s the difference?
The line between the two fields can get blurry (and many people work in both), but here’s how I think of it:
| Computational Linguistics | NLP |
| Rooted in linguistics | Rooted in computer science and AI |
| Focused on explaining and modeling language | Focused on building tools and systems |
| Often theoretical or data-driven linguistics | Often engineering-focused and performance-driven |
| Examples: parsing syntax, studying morphology | Examples: sentiment analysis, machine translation |
Think of computational linguistics as the science of language and NLP as the engineering side of language technology.
Why this matters to me
As someone who’s really interested in computational linguistics, I find myself drawn to the linguistic side of things, like how language varies, how meaning is structured, and how AI models sometimes get things subtly wrong because they don’t “understand” language the way humans do.
At the same time, I still explore NLP, especially when working on applied projects like sentiment analysis or topic modeling. I think having a strong foundation in linguistics makes me a better NLP researcher (or student), because I’m more aware of the complexity and nuance of language.
Final thoughts
If you’re just getting started, you don’t have to pick one or the other. Read papers from both fields. Try projects that help you learn both theory and application. Over time, you’ll probably find yourself leaning more toward one, but having experience in both will only help.
I’m still learning, and I’m excited to keep going deeper into both sides. If you’re interested too, let me know! I’m always up for sharing reading lists, courses, or just thoughts on cool research.
— Andrew
CompLing Insights 
Leave a comment